Multichain DeFi vs Ethereum Which is Dominant? | Value Network

Multichain DeFi vs Ethereum Which is Dominant?


DeFi becoming active across multiple blockchains doesn’t mean the fall of Ethereum. But what does it mean?

The recent months have witnessed the ascend of dApps such as 1inch, Sushi, and UniSwap, using the multichain infrastructure of Ethereum-compatible alternatives like Binance Smart Chain (BSC) Polygon. What does all this mean in terms of Ethereum’s long-standing dominance?

For some time now, the multichain paradigm has been grabbing attention in the world of DeFi. This is mainly because of the promise to offer faster and cheaper services than what is currently provided by the old player in the field – Ethereum. The best part? They also offer interoperability with other platforms, Ethereum included.
The rise of the multichain phenomenon is best evident in the transactions on Polygon and BSC, dramatically overshadowing those carried out on Ethereum. At the moment of writing, BSC had 13,3 million daily transactions compared to Ethereum’s 1,7 million.

DeFi platform going multichain.

The appeal and capabilities of these new platforms have driven the growth of multichain DeFi products like:

1inch: a decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator network that unites decentralized protocols for aggregation, liquidity, and limit order to facilitate faster, safer, and more lucrative DeFi operations. Its native token launched on BSC to become a bridge between the Binance and Ethereum networks in February. In May, the platform also expanded to Polygon. 1inch is the tenth-largest dApp on BSC and eleventh-largest on Polygon in terms of unique wallet addresses.

Sushi: a community-driven DeFi platform providing a full DeFi product stack. Sushi is a fork of Uniswap but now carries a suite of features not yet available at Uniswap. Featured on Ethereum for nearly a year, SushiSwap had only 4,194 unique active wallets, but since going live on Polygon in March, this number has already topped 27,000 in mid-June. It shows an unstoppable tendency for growth in the face of a general downward trend of the majority of the rest of the crypto market.

UniSwap: a multichain token swapping platform that launched on Ethereum. It has already attracted thousands of active users and transactions per day on the Polygon Network, generating billions in volume. This is much more than its Ethereum and BSC versions, where it averaged less than 1k daily transactions.

What is behind this extreme growth?

Ethereum is currently the dominant infrastructure for DeFi creators – thanks to its liquidity, a community of developers, robust safety features, and the potential of seamless composability with other DeFi products.

However, it isn’t without problems. It has low throughput, delayed finality, and poor user experience in terms of gas fees. The latter significantly hinders current DeFi activities on Ethereum, along with any significant mainstream adoption. This becomes even more relevant with the increasing sophistication of dApps that requires more gas increasingly to function.

To overcome these problems yet continue relying on Ethereum’s robust ecosystem, many projects have turned to Ethereum-compatible blockchains, such as the independent BSC and Ethereum’s layer 2 scaling solution Polygon. These multichain platforms provide everything a new DeFi user requires – speed, safety, efficiency, and low fees – a combination they couldn’t find on Ethereum.

In contrast to the Ethereum network, which imposes gas fees on every single transaction, these multichain ecosystems link with each other and scale in their unique ways. This allows them to reduce most of the system costs to a minimum.

They facilitate scalable functionality for DeFi products which can retain their liquidity on Ethereum at the same time. This pushes these products toward growth and development past a single environment, potentially leading to more competitive costs than solely Ethereum-based projects.

The above established Ethereum apps like 1inch have certainly helped the multichain cause, as they brought their users with them to these new environments. More recently, BSC dApps have started increasingly moving over to Polygon seeking further market share.

Multichain is the future.

While this might look like a clear case for multichain environments versus Ethereum, things are more complex than that.
Ethereum may be processing a lot fewer transactions than either BSC or Polygon. Still, the value flowing through these transactions paints a different picture, with Ethereum coming out as a winner.

In other words – although BSC and Polygon dApps attract users in great numbers, Ethereum dApps are still taking care of a large chunk of the value. This means that whales and maximalists still prefer Ethereum finance dApps. New users, on the other hand, prefer the alternatives.
All things considered, it’s clear that the complex multichain story has only just begun, and we’re looking forward to seeing what the future holds and how the DeFi space transforms once again with the long-awaited emergence of Ethereum 2.0.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Post

Explaining DeFi To Your Family

Next Post

Why Businesses Need to embrace DeFi

Related Posts